As NATO leaders prepare to gather in Ankara, Turkey, the 2026 Summit may prove to be one of the most consequential in the alliance's history. For more than 75 years, NATO has rested on a simple bargain: American leadership backed by growing European capability. Today, both sides of that equation are under pressure. Organizers prize the traditional family photo of 32 leaders standing shoulder to shoulder to project solidarity, but this year, that image will mask difficult conversations.

The immediate question hanging over Ankara is not whether NATO will survive, but what kind of alliance it will become. As U.S. officials have confirmed that President Donald Trump will attend, the story is no longer whether an American President will show up, but what message he intends to deliver about America's future role in the alliance. President Trump has been blunt: Europe must shoulder a far greater share of the defense burden, particularly in conventional forces, as Washington shifts its focus to other global challenges. For Europeans, the vital question is whether this is a negotiating tactic or a permanent shift in American priorities as they contemplate European strategic autonomy and what that means.

Russia's war against Ukraine, now well into its fifth year, remains the strategic backdrop. While Ukraine will not receive a dramatic new pathway to NATO membership, allies will focus on locking in long-term military assistance and strengthening Kyiv's economic and societal resilience against Putin's Moscow. At the same time, the political landscape within the alliance has shifted. The arrival of a new government in Hungary has eased a persistent internal obstacle. Budapest appears more willing to work constructively with Kyiv, suggesting a less confrontational approach than under Viktor Orban. Host country Turkey also seeks to leverage its position. Sitting at the crossroads of Europe, the Middle East, and the Black Sea, Ankara wants to present itself as an indispensable strategic actor capable of bridging these internal divides.

Yet those divides extend beyond Europe's borders. Renewed American interest in the strategic value of the Arctic, including Greenland, has occasionally unsettled allies. It serves as a reminder that modern NATO must manage complex disagreements over territory and strategy from within. Ultimately, the Ankara Summit marks a transition to a new era—an alliance where Europe carries more responsibility, America demands greater reciprocity, and collective defense must adapt to a more dangerous world. The real test will not be the final communique, but whether NATO can prove its transatlantic bond remains credible, resilient, and indispensable.

For further insights and analysis on the transatlantic relationship, visit wilsoncenter.org and follow us on social media.