Skip to main content

Originally published in the Globe and Mail, August 9, 2018

Relations between the United States and its trading partners are at their lowest ebb since the imposition of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff that triggered the Great Depression. Canada’s sales to the United States represent some 76% of its total merchandise exports putting Canadian businesses in the eye of the hurricane.  But Canada has an ally. In 1994, the economies of Canada and Mexico were united – for better or worse – through the North American Free Trade Agreement.

At first, it was an uneasy relationship.  The priority for both countries in those early days experimenting with new free trade agreements was secure and predictable trade with the United States, the largest market for both.  Addition of a third country was an unwanted complication.  Even though inputs from both Canada and Mexico found their way into U.S. finished goods, there was little direct trade between the two.

Today, with the manufacturing transformed into a geographically dispersed process, both Canada and Mexico recognize the importance of NAFTA to facilitate movement of inputs across integrated and efficient supply chains and this has strengthened the bilateral relationship. Canadian investment and technology help to develop the capacities of Mexican aerospace workers and Mexican know-how and market demand help to preserve and expand the Canadian auto parts industry.

North America’s competitiveness in the world depends on the complementary mix of endowments that all three countries bring to the NAFTA relationship but that relationship is under threat as a result of escalating tariff wars and deal-killing demands that block progress towards a modernized NAFTA.

Some Canadians are in denial about the trade threats emanating from the White House. They believe that Canada should not be in the crosshairs because Canada is the largest buyer of U.S. products and wage rates and labour standards are comparable to those in the United States. But reason plays  little role in the political theater than has taken over trade policy today.

Canada is in a disadvantageous position vis-à-vis the United States because trade relations with Canada are all carrot and no stick. No matter what punitive actions the White House throws at Canadians, they will continue to be a secure, reliable trading partner because that is the way Canadian businesses and institutions. So, the beatings will continue as long as they serve a political purpose in the U.S.

Mexico, on the other hand, has both carrot and stick.  The Peña-Nieto administration explicitly tied cooperation on borders, migration, drugs and security with progress on trade. Mexico’s capacity to unleash instability in the U.S., especially on the southern border, provides leverage in the U.S. Congress that Canada cannot muster.

Fortunately, NAFTA’s arranged marriage between Canada and Mexico has come of age.  Government-to-government linkages have been brought to life through companies such as Bombardier, Palliser Furniture, Magna, Scotiabank and Grupo Bimbo (this is the Mexican company that now manufactures the iconic Canadian Joe Louis cake).

Politically, the Canada-Mexico relationship has experienced some bumps, due in large part to the Harper government’s onerous visa requirements for Mexican travelers, but the Trudeau government has mended fences.  Minister Freeland and other members of Cabinet have made frequent outreach trips to Mexico and Canada’s ambassador to Mexico, Pierre Alarie, quarterbacks the relationship with skills honed through deep knowledge of, and appreciation for, Mexico and its people.

Despite rumors of one throwing the other under the bus, Mexico and Canada have stuck together through the NAFTA 2.0 negotiations, recognizing that a united front gives them a strong defense against the U.S. divide-and-conquer approach.

There are issues over which the two countries differ, but they are matters of degree not principle. Mexico cares more about tomatoes, Canada cares more about dairy but both agree that a modernized NAFTA would deliver competitive for North America in the world.

The question for Canada is whether President-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador will retain the solidarity with Canada extended by his predecessor. So far, so good.  Statements by USTR Robert Lighthizer about doing bilateral deal with Mexico first in order to extract concessions from Canada have been countered by reaffirmations from the AMLO administration to the trilateral process.

The Canada-Mexico union is going to require continued attention to ensure its durability. While both Mexico and Canada are committed to blocking the U.S. sunset clause proposal, on other issues such as rules of origin for autos or dairy protections, each side will be tempted by the U.S. to break their alliance. This would be a mistake because while such deals would provide national gains in the short term,  Canada and Mexico would lose the collective leverage needed to finish a deal with a U.S. Trade Representative eager to exploit any weakness.

About the Author

Laura Dawson

Laura Dawson

Former Director, Canada Institute;
Former Senior Economic Analyst, U.S. Embassy, Ottawa, Canada
Read More

Canada Institute

Bound by common geopolitical interests and strong economic and cultural ties, Canada and the United States enjoy the world's most successful bilateral relationship. The Wilson Center's Canada Institute is the only public policy forum in the world dedicated to the full spectrum of Canada-U.S. issues. The Canada Institute is a global leader for policymakers, academics and business leaders to engage in non-partisan, informed dialogue about the current and future state of the relationship.     Read more