Skip to main content

Successful Country-Led Scale-Up of RMNCAH Interventions

The unveiling of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 signaled a new era in global health. This era is characterized by country leadership in scaling up high impact health interventions to meet national goals. The goal of a country-led scale-up is to achieve widespread and sustainable impact, requiring both highly effective coverage of the population in need and institutionalization of key systems supports to sustain these expanded services.

Date & Time

May. 16, 2018
9:00am – 11:00am ET


6th Floor, Woodrow Wilson Center
Get Directions


“We are seeing increasingly self-reliant countries develop national health sector plans solidly grounded on technical evidence,” said Dr. Jim Ricca of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s flagship Maternal and Child Survival Program (MCSP) at a recent Wilson Center event. Expanding successful reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent healthcare (known as RMNCAH) interventions to the national level could make a significant contribution to meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals for mortality reduction, he said.

Evidence-Based Interventions

To scale up maternal and newborn healthcare, countries need to bolster interventions that have already accumulated “enough evidence to get a ‘go’ signal from country decision-makers for scale-up efforts, but are not yet part of routine practice,” said Dr. Ricca, such as improving water sources, using the antiseptic Chlorhexidine, vaccinating against rotavirus, and managing sepsis.

Most likely, these efforts will “take place over years in a complex and not completely predictable environment,” said Dr. Ricca, “where critical features of [the] landscape might change, like the political or economic situation.” Therefore, strategic, evidence-based planning is critical for achieving positive, timely, and widespread results.

Local evidence, for example, provided the impetus for successfully scaling up Chlorhexidine in Nigeria, said Dr. Abosede Adeniran, Director of the Child Health Division for Nigeria’s Federal Ministry of Health. When applied to the umbilical cord, Chlorhexidine can reduce severe infection by 68 percent and mortality by 23 percent, potentially saving more than 300,000 lives each year.

After the success of two community-based, statewide distributions programs—in Sokoto and Bauchi—the Nigerian government launched the National Strategy for Scale-Up of Chlorhexidine. “We’ve been able to make some remarkable progress with the federal government providing the strategic direction,” said Dr. Adeniran. “We do not want to lose that momentum.”

Sustaining Success

“There’s a tendency in this kind of world to focus on the introduction phase of something, and not necessarily on the continuation phase,” said Larry Cooley, President Emeritus of Management Systems International. To sustain impact, efforts to scale-up healthcare must take on a long-term, systemic approach that is particularly sensitive to private-sector incentives. Program designers need to ask: “What’s the funding necessary to get something on stream? And what’s the funding necessary to sustain it over time?” said Cooley.

Ideally, this systemic approach should also involve a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including those outside the global health sector, said Laura Ghiron, Vice President of Partners in Expanding Health Quality and Access. Programs that partner with external agencies—such as the ministry of planning, the ministry of finance, and private sector organizations—“have a much better chance of moving-ahead in lock-step and having the funds available,” said Ghiron.

To be sure, “one cap does not fit all,” said Dr. Stephen Hodgins, Associate Professor for Global Health at the University of Alberta and Editor-in-Chief of Global Health: Science and Practice. Consequently, “it is important to understand the scale-up environment where you're introducing your intervention,” he said.

Dr. Hodgins advocates for a two-tiered, “looped” learning approach that prioritizes adaptability and reflexivity. “Single loop learning” involves closely monitoring and evaluating implementation issues—such as interruptions in the supply chain—and making adjustments when necessary. Whereas, Hodgins explained, “double loop learning” involves re-examining the underlying assumptions and causal models of a scale-up project to determine if and when a completely new strategy is required.

Country Stories: Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the expansion of community case management has dramatically reduced childhood illnesses such as malaria, diarrhea, pneumonia, and malnutrition. Since 2005, the DRC has trained more than 14,000 healthcare professionals on integrated management of these diseases, ultimately affecting more than 10 million people across all 26 provinces, said Dr. Jean Fidèle Ilunga Mubayi of the DRC’s Ministry of Health.

“For the very first time, the national budget of the Congolese government has a specific line dedicated to supporting maternal and child health,” said Dr. Ilunga. Synergistic partnerships are pivotal in achieving and maintaining such positive results, he said. “Some [partners] provide support through training and supervision; others help with procurement of drugs and commodities, and others implement supporting programs, such as result-based financing.”

Image removed.

Rwanda implemented postpartum family planning interventions by collaborating with technical working groups that specialize in data collection and measurement, said Dr. Jacqueline Umunyana, Senior Program Learning and Scale Up Advisor for MCSP Rwanda. These and other MSCP-supported interventions ultimately expanded into 10 districts and contributed to the steady decrease of birth asphyxia, which had previously been the leading cause of neonatal death in Rwanda.

Where There’s a Will, There’s A Way

Despite significant advancements in newborn and maternal health in Nigeria and Rwanda, both Dr. Umunyana and Dr. Ilunga pointed to several issues that need critical attention moving forward, including making healthcare more accessible in remote locations, developing leadership at multiple political levels, and using data at the operational level.

Though many scale-up projects will inevitably encounter shocks and stresses along the way, “if you have an adapted learning approach, then you can make things work,” said Dr. Koki Agarwal, MCSP Director. “Our country teams have demonstrated that where there’s a will, there’s a way,” she said. “And the country examples show us very clearly that they can, and they are.”

Written by Julianne Liebenguth and edited by Meaghan Parker.

Hosted By

Maternal Health Initiative

Life and health are the most basic human rights, yet disparities between and within countries continue to grow. No single solution or institution can address the variety of health concerns the world faces. By leveraging, building on, and coordinating the Wilson Center’s strong regional and cross-cutting programming, the Maternal Health Initiative (MHI) promotes dialogue and understanding among practitioners, scholars, community leaders, and policymakers.  Read more

Global Risk and Resilience Program

The Global Risk and Resilience Program (GRRP) seeks to support the development of inclusive, resilient networks in local communities facing global change. By providing a platform for sharing lessons, mapping knowledge, and linking people and ideas, GRRP and its affiliated programs empower policymakers, practitioners, and community members to participate in the global dialogue on sustainability and resilience. Empowered communities are better able to develop flexible, diverse, and equitable networks of resilience that can improve their health, preserve their natural resources, and build peace between people in a changing world.  Read more

Thank you for your interest in this event. Please send any feedback or questions to our Events staff.