Russia’s war is devastating the people and economy of Ukraine, but also sending shockwaves through global systems for natural resources like food, oil and natural gas, and critical minerals. Together, Russia and Ukraine—sometimes referred to as the breadbasket of Europe—account for 29% of global wheat exports, 80% of the world’s sunflower oil, and 40% of its barley. Before the war, Russia provided around 10% of the global supply of oil and just last year, 40% of Europe’s gas came from Russia. And while oil dominates the headlines, the disruption of another resource abundant in the region—critical minerals—has implications for how the United States and its allies respond to interrupted supply chains.
While the biggest impacts of the conflict will continue to be felt by Ukrainians and Russians, the secondary effects on global food and energy systems could be substantial. It’s only by looking at these natural resource systems together that we can truly understand the compounding effect of the conflict on global supply chains. In this panel discussion, experts helped unpack these complicated systems and explored how policymakers can respond now to head off the worst future outcomes.
- Russia’s war in Ukraine has sent a shockwave across global food, energy, and mineral supply chains. Russia and Ukraine account for 28 percent of wheat exports and are top suppliers of fertilizers and their raw ingredients, like potash and nitrogen. The near-term impacts on availability and price will be felt most acutely in places with narrow margins of error and direct dependencies—places like Libya, Yemen, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and sub-Saharan Africa. But tertiary effects will be felt globally. Long term, purchasing power imbalances combined with the impacts of a changing climate necessitate a shift in decision-making from one focused on efficiency to one focused on resilience.
- In some respects, current energy trade of Russian oil and gas exports to Europe look startlingly like business as usual. The U.S. oil and gas industry will play an important short-term role in reducing dependence on Russian energy and stabilizing markets and we’re likely to see growth in the U.S. oil and gas markets over the next couple of years. However, energy security and climate security are two sides of the same coin—without attention to one you cannot have long-term stability of the other.
- Ukraine holds 20 percent of the world’s resources of titanium and has the largest Uranium deposit in Europe. Estimated investments in Ukraine’s mining sector prior to the conflict were projected at $10 billion for 24 projects. The conflict has resulted in standstill investments, reluctance for the reinvestment of capital, and an unclear authority of resources post-conflict. Russia and China are major holders of critical and rare earth minerals. What China does next and how China reacts to the war will be an important long-term global security outcome.
Jonathan Elkind looks at the impact of losing Russian natural gas and how Europe will adjust its supply.
"The U.S. Administration needs to engage in smart and creative diplomacy around the globe."
"We face the reality and responsibility of responding immediately to climate change, but not without making sure we assure the stability of our economy as well."
“In times of crisis, there is an initial effect, the effect of the sanctions, and an aftereffect when the global economy is trying to adjust to the aftermath of the crisis. In this case, the global economy is trying to adjust to the changes in the oil, mineral, and energy supply chains."
Emily King: The minerals found in Ukraine and Russia that are used in our daily lives and how supply chains will adjust now.
“Twenty percent of the world’s titanium resources are located in Ukraine, which is very important to the aerospace field. Therefore, depending on the outcome of this war, the U.S. and other countries will have to deal with the changes in this supply chain.”
"Russia is a huge exporter of nitrogen and potash fertilizer, which directly affects farmers and the agriculture supply chain depending on the war’s outcome."
"Ukraine and Russia are responsible for 28% of the wheat exports. They are responsible for providing countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey, which are very dependent on agriculture. Right now, we face the issue of those countries not being able to access those resources that are essential to their economy. "
Bram Govaerts: How will the Middle East and North Africa adapt now that the world’s primary wheat producers are at war?
“What is happening in Ukraine is an example of how disrupted our industries and global chains can be given they are very interconnected. Therefore, we have immediate action to take in order to boost the production of crops with fewer resources available, such as fertilizers. We also need to look at where we are going to be supplied with alternate resources. This shifts our paradigm and forces us to come together to solve these issues at the global level and bring innovation to drive change in order to secure a stable future. "
Sharon Burke: "This is an incredibly dangerous moment."
“Energy requires water to be produced. Energy is important for agriculture, and agriculture is important for minerals, but it is also important for energy. These are all linked together, and this crisis is going to bring profound shocks to the global economy. We cannot address this energy crisis without addressing the way we govern. An issue with this is that the way we govern usually addresses one issue at a time, one bureau at a time, etc. If we can’t figure out how to govern in these times of complexity, then we cannot understand how to invest our money to address this crisis.”
Event Summary | New Security Beat
Visit to read more highlights and coverage of this event.Learn More
Environmental Change and Security Program
The Environmental Change and Security Program (ECSP) explores the connections between environmental change, health, and population dynamics and their links to conflict, human insecurity, and foreign policy. Read more
The Asia Program promotes policy debate and intellectual discussions on U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific as well as political, economic, security, and social issues relating to the world’s most populous and economically dynamic region. Read more
Bound by common geopolitical interests and strong economic and cultural ties, Canada and the United States enjoy the world's most successful bilateral relationship. The Wilson Center's Canada Institute is the only public policy forum in the world dedicated to the full spectrum of Canada-U.S. issues. The Canada Institute is a global leader for policymakers, academics and business leaders to engage in non-partisan, informed dialogue about the current and future state of the relationship. Read more
China Environment Forum
Since 1997, the China Environment Forum's mission has been to forge U.S.-China cooperation on energy, environment, and sustainable development challenges. We play a unique nonpartisan role in creating multi-stakeholder dialogues around these issues. Read more
The Wilson Center’s office of Congressional Relations works to maintain a vibrant relationship with Members of Congress and their staffs. We organize and run a series of educational programs led by Wilson Center experts, ranging from seminars to podcasts, with the purpose of increasing congressional staffers’ knowledge of international policy. We also coordinate outreach to Capitol Hill, including testimonies by Wilson Center scholars and briefings for Members of Congress. Read more
Global Europe Program
The Global Europe Program addresses vital issues affecting the European continent, U.S.-European relations, and Europe’s ties with the rest of the world. It does this through scholars-in-residence, seminars, policy study groups, media commentary, international conferences and publications. Activities cover a wide range of topics, from the role of NATO, the European Union and the OSCE to European energy security, trade disputes, challenges to democracy, and counter-terrorism. The program investigates European approaches to policy issues of importance to the United States, including globalization, digital transformation, climate, migration, global governance, and relations with Russia and Eurasia, China and the Indo-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. Read more
The Kennan Institute is the premier U.S. center for advanced research on Russia and Eurasia and the oldest and largest regional program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The Kennan Institute is committed to improving American understanding of Russia, Ukraine, and the region through research and exchange. Read more
Latin American Program
The Wilson Center’s prestigious Latin American Program provides non-partisan expertise to a broad community of decision makers in the United States and Latin America on critical policy issues facing the Hemisphere. The Program provides insightful and actionable research for policymakers, private sector leaders, journalists, and public intellectuals in the United States and Latin America. To bridge the gap between scholarship and policy action, it fosters new inquiry, sponsors high-level public and private meetings among multiple stakeholders, and explores policy options to improve outcomes for citizens throughout the Americas. Drawing on the Wilson Center’s strength as the nation’s key non-partisan forum, the Program serves as a trusted source of analysis and a vital point of contact between the worlds of scholarship and action. Read more
The Mexico Institute seeks to improve understanding, communication, and cooperation between Mexico and the United States by promoting original research, encouraging public discussion, and proposing policy options for enhancing the bilateral relationship. A binational Advisory Board, chaired by Luis Téllez and Earl Anthony Wayne, oversees the work of the Mexico Institute. Read more
Middle East Program
The Wilson Center’s Middle East Program serves as a crucial resource for the policymaking community and beyond, providing analyses and research that helps inform U.S. foreign policymaking, stimulates public debate, and expands knowledge about issues in the wider Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Read more
Since its inception in 2017, the Polar Institute has become a premier forum for discussion and policy analysis of Arctic and Antarctic issues, and is known in Washington, DC and elsewhere as the Arctic Public Square. The Institute holistically studies the central policy issues facing these regions—with an emphasis on Arctic governance, climate change, economic development, scientific research, security, and Indigenous communities—and communicates trusted analysis to policymakers and other stakeholders. Read more