Skip to main content
Support
Event

The EU After the Lisbon Treaty

Following the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty last year, the European Union (EU) has initiated a series of decision-making and institutional reforms, including the creation of the External Action Service (EAS). Angelos Pangratis, Deputy Head of the European Commission Delegation in Washington, offered an informal progress report on how the EAS will be structured and the key areas of cooperation between the EU and the United States. He argued that the success of the EAS will be judged by its ability to produce concrete results in coordinating and implementing a comprehensive common foreign and security policy for the EU’s 27 members.

Date & Time

Dec. 20, 2010
11:00am – 12:00pm

The EU After the Lisbon Treaty

Following the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty last year, the European Union (EU) has initiated a series of decision-making and institutional reforms, including the creation of the External Action Service (EAS). Angelos Pangratis, Deputy Head of the European Commission Delegation in Washington, offered an informal progress report on how the EAS will be structured and the key areas of cooperation between the EU and the United States. He argued that the success of the EAS will be judged by its ability to produce concrete results in coordinating and implementing a comprehensive common foreign and security policy for the EU’s 27 members.

Pangratis praised the EAS for having completed a productive round of discussions in the first year following its formation. The EU’s existing 130 delegations worldwide and the EAS’s staff (comprised of diplomatic personnel from all member states) is headed by the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton. Although the EAS is institutionally independent, Pangratis explained, it works closely with the Commission and the Council. The EAS is divided into six departments, including relations with multilateral bodies, global affairs, budget and personnel, relations with accession and neighboring countries, relations with industrialized countries and relations with developing countries.

Already, the new institutional arrangements have given delegation heads a better sense of the EU’s commitment to its foreign policy mission and a greater sense of satisfaction from their role in it. Pangratis asserted that this is an extraordinary moment, since the establishment of the EAS reinforces the overall strength of the EU and the role that member states can play in world affairs. According to Pangratis, “the more we look into things that we can do, the more things we can do together,” to ensure the political stability of a “better and more functional EU.”

The current economic downturn presents a challenge to the developed world. Within the EU, member states have recognized that the way in which the euro zone currently operates has exacerbated the crisis in some countries. Euro zone countries could not respond to the ballooning debt crisis by devaluing their currencies, which left countries like Greece, with no alternative but to seek major internal adjustments such as decreasing state salaries and cutting welfare spending—which create more economic problems. While the Greek and Irish cases are making headlines, all of the euro zone members are susceptible to the same fate. Therefore, Pangratis explained, that these circumstances demand that the EU find ways to improve fiscal sustainability within the euro zone.

The Lisbon Treaty will have an impact on the Euro-Atlantic relationship, which Pangratis characterized as suffering from occasional conceptual misinterpretation on both sides. The complexity and novelty of the EU demands careful study and adaptation by both EU and U.S. diplomats. The stakes in the Euro-Atlantic relationship continue to be high, Pangratis asserted, since the United States and the EU share a number of fundamental challenges such as improving energy efficiency and enhancing energy security; preserving the environment; promoting technological advancement; and enhancing consumer protection. To address these issues, the EU and the United States need to recognize their shared interests and values. Diverging agendas, in Pangratis’s view, often present an impediment to attaining a higher level of coordination in EU-US relations. In an increasingly interdependent world, strengthening ties between developing countries has emerged as a priority on both sides of the Atlantic, thus creating favorable conditions for close-knit cooperation between Europe and the United States.

Drafted by Kristina Terzieva, Program Assistant and Nida Gelazis, Senior Associate, European StudiesChristian Ostermann, Director, European Studies


Hosted By

Global Europe Program

The Global Europe Program addresses vital issues affecting Europe’s relations with the rest of the world through scholars-in-residence, seminars, international conferences and publications. These programmatic activities cover wide-ranging topics include: European energy security, the role of the European Union and NATO, democratic transitions, and counter-terrorism, among others. The program also investigates comparatively European approaches to policy issues of importance to the United States, including migration, global governance, and relations with Russia, China and the Middle East.  Read more

Cold War International History Project

The Cold War International History Project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War. Through an award winning Digital Archive, the Project allows scholars, journalists, students, and the interested public to reassess the Cold War and its many contemporary legacies. It is part of the Wilson Center's History and Public Policy Program.  Read more

History and Public Policy Program

The History and Public Policy Program uses history to improve understanding of important global dynamics, trends in international relations, and American foreign policy.  Read more

Tagged

Event Feedback